|
Monday, 30 April 2012
quote [ Hundreds of documents were discovered by German cryptologists embedded inside a pornographic movie on a memory disk belonging to a suspected al Qaeda operative arrested in Berlin last year. ]
[by erich wiess@11:57pmGMT] [+10 Illegal Pr0n] |
|
brat#3
said @ 1:18am GMT on 1st May
Well that was dumb. They assumed that whoever would confiscate the memory disk wouldn't pay attention to the porn? Given Al Qaeda's feelings toward westerners, that's like hiding a drink driver's car keys in a bottle of whiskey. |
|
theolypse
said @ 3:18am GMT on 1st May
Yes, but dissolving them, so that, in order to reconstitute them, he has to chemically treat the whiskey instead of drinking it. |
|
brat#3
said @ 3:20am GMT on 1st May
Well sure, if you take the analogy that far. |
|
theolypse
said @ 2:18am GMT on 2nd May
I think they imagined us all too busy masturbating to try cryptology. |
|
DarkShadowRavenDragonGrrl69
said @ 11:21am GMT on 3rd May
Quick, someone find the Kate Beaton cartoon about de Hevesy dissolving a Nobel Prize in Aqua Regia! (you'd figure I have enough keywords for Google to find it for me) |
|
eIfish
said @ 5:58pm GMT on 1st May
Agreed. It would be easy enough to hide it by XORing the LSB of something innocuous and commonly found on a memory stick, like portable Firefox's tens of megabytes of chrome images. |
|
mechanical contrivance
said @ 1:28am GMT on 1st May
The article doesn't say how the documents were embedded in the porn. Was it steganography or what? |
|
Ankylosaur
said @ 1:45am GMT on 1st May
Steganography is the general term for hiding messages inside something else, so, yes, it was steganography... unless halfway through the porno a guy with a beard appears and starts reciting super secret terror plans to the camera. |
|
GordonGuano
said @ 1:56am GMT on 1st May
[Score:1 Underrated]
Way to go, you may have just discovered a new fetish. |
|
Naruki
said @ 2:32am GMT on 1st May
[Score:3 Funny]
It'll turn out to not even be real plans, just something that Dick Cheney jerks off to. |
|
cb361
said @ 5:17pm GMT on 1st May
|
|
Bob Denver
said @ 9:50pm GMT on 1st May
Ummm...that's bush not Cheney... |
|
Naruki
said @ 1:36am GMT on 2nd May
Again, something that Dick Cheney jerks off to. |
|
theolypse
said @ 2:20am GMT on 2nd May
...Why is this not a scene from The Night Porter, as it should be? |
|
sherlock
said @ 5:02am GMT on 1st May
[Score:3 Informative]
Steganography is the general term for hiding messages |
|
sua_sponte
said @ 2:05am GMT on 1st May
Bow chicka bow wow...BOOM. |
|
lilmookieesquire
said @ 2:51am GMT on 1st May
Full article: |
|
lalanda
said @ 3:13am GMT on 1st May
Illegal Pr0n mod is hilarious. |
|
endopol
said @ 3:22am GMT on 1st May
You should have seen the post about the crayfish smugglers. |
|
Kanye West
said @ 6:24am GMT on 1st May
That shit cray |
|
iosef
said @ 6:35am GMT on 1st May
not as far fetched as one might think. |
|
granitewitch
said @ 10:07am GMT on 1st May
This is not the first time that this tactic has been used. Apparently it's somehow encoded into the pixels of still photos. My friend in the Turkish National Police told me a story of something similar, where on a raid they found some hardcore porn on a CD in a bag with a Koran. He thought it very suspicious that porn would be stored with a holy book, so he had it closely scrutinized- and sure enough, there were plans for an attack encoded. I really wish I could tell the full story, but I'm not sure how much of that information is still somewhat classified, so I'll leave it vague. |
|
Ankylosaur
said @ 9:31pm GMT on 1st May
[Score:3 Informative]
I don't know how it's done with JPEG images or video since they use lossy compression, but the classic (and simplest) way of hiding information in a still image is to hide it in the least significant bits (LSBs) of the color values for each pixel. Say you have a pixel that's red. It's data values are (in binary) R=11111111 G=00000000 B=00000000. You can encode three bits of information (say "010") in this pixel by changing the last digits of the three values to those bits, making the new pixel value of R=11111110 G=00000001 B=00000000. Here's what that looks like (original pixel color is on the left, steganographically encoded color on the right): ![]() This new color is pretty much indistinguishable from the original to the naked eye when put side-by-side like above, and when it occurs in a photograph which already has pixels that vary slightly in color due to vagaries in the CCD recorded light, it's pretty much impossible to tell that the image has a hidden message without reading out the LSBs and seeing if it makes a message (and if that message has been encrypted with any identifying markers removed, or especially using a one time pad, then, well, good luck with that, especially if you have to do it for every image floating around some corner of the internet.) |
|
Ankylosaur
said @ 9:35pm GMT on 1st May
BTW, this can be done with sound too, or any data where the values can and do vary slightly. |
|
swiggy
said @ 10:57am GMT on 1st May
Al Qaeda is coming. |
|
granitewitch
said @ 11:11am GMT on 1st May
Get the mop. |
|
Supreme_Coconut
said @ 2:23pm GMT on 1st May
I guess that would explain all the porn they found in bin Laden's compound. |
|
assbastard
said @ 3:02pm GMT on 1st May
I was going to say, yeah, he was found with a lot of porn on his computers... guess they'll have to revisit that. With a mop in the room, hopefully. |
|
bbqkink
said @ 11:26pm GMT on 1st May
[Score:2 Informative]
Bin Laden documents to go online Thursday For the first time, the general public will be able to see a number of the 6,000-plus documents seized in last year's raid on Osama bin Laden's compound. The CTC didn't say which and how many documents will be released I bet we don't get the porn.... http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/01/us/bin-laden-documents/index.html |
|
IBM
said @ 3:02am GMT on 2nd May
sounds like a made up plot to use as an excuse to crack down on porns. |