Sensible Erection | Manitoba judge in bondage.

Wednesday, 1 September 2010

quote [ Naked photographs of a senior Manitoba judge engaged in bondage are part of a man's complaints to legal watchdogs about the judge's past and that of her husband, CBC News has learned. ]

More Canadian legal shenanigans in the extended. So far the pictures and the video mentioned in the extended article have not been leaked.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2010/08/31/bc-rcmp-sex-in-jail-cell.html

[by clumsy_juggler@4:37pmGMT] [+4 WTF]

Comments

maryyugo said @ 4:41pm GMT on 1st Sep
Here come da judge?

ralfmaximus said @ 5:06pm GMT on 1st Sep
Not unless you tie them up first, apparently.

feeling constipated said @ 7:47pm GMT on 1st Sep

swiggy said @ 4:48pm GMT on 1st Sep [Score:2 Insightful]

clumsy_juggler said @ 5:04pm GMT on 1st Sep
I agree. Consider it a scavenger hunt, if you find the pictures mentioned feel free to post them.

zkhan said @ 5:33pm GMT on 1st Sep [Score:1 Funny]
Pff. That was easy. Googled 'manitoba judge' and there it was!

judge

ralfmaximus said @ 5:35pm GMT on 1st Sep
Wow. Canadian justice is harsh.

blacksun said @ 5:40pm GMT on 1st Sep
Don't mess with "The Judge"

lascivious said @ 10:47pm GMT on 1st Sep
I googled, but got distracted with sexiness:

captives for pleasure
Xxx
best
device bondage
lusty slut
hot asian women
spanked with a paddle
claudia and eve? from backdrop.net's list of 1990's models

for the ladies, homos and sexually open minded:
cowboy from elisa
image amplified

salacious tails on asstr.org

So I highly recommend posting the search journey too. Much more fulfilling...at least for me. >:D

Todomanna said @ 5:22pm GMT on 1st Sep
Canadian judges have all the fun :\

spite48 said @ 5:31pm GMT on 1st Sep
Generally speaking, Canadians take a different view of sexual scandals than Americans. Historically, it is my impression that we shrug and roll our eyes when prime ministers or other high officials are rumoured to be sexually active, adulterous, or otherwise naughty.

This Judge could either a turning point in that perspective. My view is that she should be left well enough alone. She didn't do anything unlawful, and her sexual practices - made public without her consent - are nobody's business. Even if she was willingly an amateur porn starlet - that's neither illegal nor improper.

The asshole who accepted $25000 to destroy the emails and photographs, and then released them - that guy is on my list of people to sneer at.

ralfmaximus said @ 5:38pm GMT on 1st Sep
..asshole who accepted $25000 to destroy the emails and photographs..

Isn't that bribery? Details are unclear... it wasn't a legal settlement, was it?

So couldn't the judge bring charges against said asshole?

remiq said @ 6:05pm GMT on 1st Sep
Bribery? Not a blackmail?

ralfmaximus said @ 6:27pm GMT on 1st Sep
Eep, yes. That. Brainfart. :\

spite48 said @ 7:41pm GMT on 1st Sep
No, COMPLETELY different. It was a legal settlement which included conditions that he destroy the emails and photographs.

So, yeah, likely it was legal blackmail.

spite48 said @ 5:37pm GMT on 1st Sep
The jail sex thing is funny:

"If one person was severely intoxicated, then it brings into question their ability to consent to that type of activity," he said. "It is our duty to ensure that they don't come to any type of harm, and that would include being engaged in sexual activity while they're drunk."

Um, the police are now responsible for preventing two drunk people from having sex - with each other? I get that drunkenness can mitigate consent, but when both people are drunk, both consent and neither complains after?

crom said @ 6:44pm GMT on 1st Sep
I hear you, but bear in mind that they were both in jail for public intoxication at the time. If your drunkenness has reached the point where the police have become involved and deemed you unfit to coexist with other humans in public, I think it's reasonable to speculate that you might be past the point of giving consent to get fucked by some other drunk person who happens to be in the same cage.

spite48 said @ 7:42pm GMT on 1st Sep
Stop making it less funny. :)

sacrelicious said @ 6:24pm GMT on 1st Sep
at first this seemed like just a case of sexual harassment, albeit a rather unusual one. then this paragraph:

King's lawyer, Bill Gange, said King was suffering from depression at the time and didn't tell his wife that he had shown the pictures to anyone — or that he had posted the photos on a porn website.

yeah, I can see how a person could be so broken up by unwanted sexual advances that they'd POST THE PICTURES ON A PORN SITE. yeah, that's believable.

headlessfriar said @ 9:35pm GMT on 1st Sep
You're confusing two people. King, the husband, was depressed and posted his wife's pictures to the porn site. King also made the advances to a
client of his for divorce proceedings, a Mr. Adams. The plaintiff here is Mr. Adams.

sacrelicious said @ 2:42am GMT on 2nd Sep
ah, okay.

devilsad said @ 9:04pm GMT on 1st Sep
Was her safe word "Not Guilty" ?