Monday, 13 April 2009

Coffee break. Sorry.

quote [ Mike rushed his girlfriend to the airport to catch a flight to see her dying mother, only to watch her miss the flight because United Airline's ticketing agent refused to help because "it was time for her to go on her break." ]

Complaint from one man regarding experience with customer service. I agree we're given only one side to this story, but some people here seem to immediately blame the customer. Not sure what to think.

There's some comments on the site that help give a little more context to the story, like the law in California regarding work breaks, but even so, to have a chance to be with your mother during her final hours, and then to have that snatched away from you by bureaucracy, is insane.

Now, since apparently no one can be bothered to read the actual goddamn email, here is the bullet-point version:

1. A man gets a call from his girlfriend's father, telling him the girl's mother is dying, and that the girl should get to Portland as soon as possible.

2. He immediately leaves work, calls the United Premier reservation line on the drive home, and books a ticket. He's told to pick up the tickets at the counter.

3. He and the girlfriend get to the airport. There's a short line at the counter, and he explains to each person in line about the situation, and each agrees to let him pass.

4. He gets to the front of the line, gets to the counter, and is directed by the agent there to another counter.

5. He gets to the second counter, and speaks to a woman, the second agent. He hands her the reservation number, explains the situation. The woman hands back the number, saying that it's time for her break.

6. They proceed to argue for a few minutes, but in the end, the man and his girlfriend are forced to take a later flight. They arrive in Portland two and a half hours later than they had first hoped. The mother dies later that night.
[by Janus@8:21amGMT] [+6 WTF]

Comments

Fu Man Chu said @ 8:24am GMT on 13th Apr [Score:-5 WTF]
It sucks but really the world doesn't stop because you have a sick relative.

Would want more back info, like why were they rushing so last minute? Was the mother's illness/injuries sudden?

Janus said @ 8:36am GMT on 13th Apr
Yes, yes, yes. They got a phone call from the girlfriend's father, telling them to get to Portland right away, saying that the mother was about to die, and they got to the airport as soon as they could.

Please read the article if you're going to comment.
Fu Man Chu said @ 9:20am GMT on 13th Apr [Score:-5 Overrated]
I didn't bother to read the whole letter because honestly this isn't newsworthy to me.
Janus said @ 9:29am GMT on 13th Apr [Score:5 Insightful]
Then don't fucking comment.
Fu Man Chu said @ 11:33am GMT on 14th Apr
Because that's really what this place is about right? Don't say anything unless its positive?

I mean why bother with the ability to downmod then?


Janus said @ 2:51pm GMT on 14th Apr
Either you're deliberately misreading my message, or you're an idiot.

Do you really think I'm telling you to comment one way or another? All I'm saying is, don't say anything if you don't know what you're talking about. Get your facts straight before you comment. Is that so disagreeable a notion?

If you don't find the link newsworthy, fine; if you don't agree with my opinions, fine. But if you can't even bother to know what's going on, how can you make an informed judgment? And if you can't make an informed judgment—not an opinion formed on impulse, but a judgment based on the facts—how can you add anything relevant to a reasoned discussion? Isn't that what we're about?
Fu Man Chu said @ 9:41pm GMT on 14th Apr [Score:1 Underrated]
Hmm, an "either or" proposition in which I'm either an idiot or trolling.

Nah think I'll pass on that one.

And no, no, that's not what we're about. We're about sharing worthwhile media and information with one another and THEN discussing it. The discussion tends to fall apart (case in point) without a good base post to build on though.

And I still stand by my assertion that this isn't newsworthy. It's not a tragedy when a grown person's parents die, that's just nature taking it's course. It's perhaps a shame that she didn't get their in time but again not newsworthy.

Something to the tune of 300,000 people die a day. I fail to see how this is a death we should be discussing above any of the others.

But of course, feel free to discuss it at length. My curiosity won't let me NOT look at least a little. Just don't get all high and mighty on me because I don't comb through the tiny details of an obviously boring story.
Janus said @ 1:24pm GMT on 15th Apr
I'm going to tell you how I read your comments.

First you ask questions that you could have answered yourself if you had given one minute to reading the just the first few lines of the email. This is why I said to read the article before you comment.

But then you switch your message and say you didn't bother, because it didn't interest you. To which I responded, maybe badly.

But you have to imagine how infuriating that is—when you're trying to communicate something, and having the other person dismiss it out of hand, without understanding even the most basic premise of what's being discussed, and moreover, not even making the effort.

And I still stand by my assertion that we're about reasoned discussion. Not any sort of discussion, but one that's reasoned. Regardless of what we're talking about, the discussion will fall apart if people talk past each other without bothering to check the facts.

The fact that you misconstrued my words, deliberately or not, only added to my frustration. But all I'm trying to say is, if you're going to comment on something, know what it is you're commenting on. I honestly don't think that's unreasonable.
pleaides said @ 9:02am GMT on 13th Apr
FYI in my experience the opposite is true. In the immediate aftermath of my father's passing the entire world seemed to be actively engaged in a vast conspiracy to be extremely nice to me. It was a truly wonderful experience (despite the obvious negatives) to be exposed to the sheer awesomeness of most people.

Assuming the situation was explained to the lady who simply couldn't wait for her coffee, she's obviously a fucked up demented bitch who should be dragged out at dawn and summarily shot. They should dress her up as a pirate and drop her into a liferaft somewhere.
Naruki said @ 9:07am GMT on 13th Apr
Now, now. If you take it easy on these people, they will never learn.
Naruki said @ 9:17am GMT on 13th Apr [Score:3 Funny]
<Sarcasm>Nice revenge mod, atter_cob! Nobody will notice!</Sarcasm>
Dissonant said @ 11:36am GMT on 13th Apr
I fail.
Tirade said @ 1:04pm GMT on 13th Apr [Score:1 Insightful]
Notice what?
Naruki said @ 1:28pm GMT on 13th Apr
See? Nobody ever sees sarcasm on the Internets.
Naruki said @ 6:41am GMT on 14th Apr
<Sarcasm>Nice revenge mod, atter_cob! Nobody will notice!</Sarcasm>
Dissonant said @ 11:36am GMT on 13th Apr
Wait, are you being sarcastic?
Milkman666 said @ 9:13am GMT on 13th Apr
Sweet vengeance calms rage!

*strokes beard*
Shirobake said @ 10:13am GMT on 13th Apr [Score:2]
H-hey, that's not your beard!!






(I didn't say 'stop')
Naruki said @ 11:20am GMT on 13th Apr
What kind of sicko names his chihuahua "beard"?
VictorTyne said @ 11:22am GMT on 13th Apr
The sort of person who would own one in the first place.
Naruki said @ 6:41am GMT on 14th Apr
<Sarcasm>Nice revenge mod, atter_cob! Nobody will notice!</Sarcasm>
EPT said @ 2:25pm GMT on 14th Apr [Score:1 Underrated]
Please don't keep punishing the rest of us.
ComposerNate said @ 11:41am GMT on 13th Apr [Score:1 Funny]
atter_cob said @ 9:10am GMT on 13th Apr
The woman at the ticket counter was uncaring. I'm not sure if what she did was wrong or selfish or reasonable. I guess that to really have an opinion, I'd have to hear her side of the story first.

In any case, if you're ever in a similar situation, then here is a bit of advice: call on your phone and talk to a sales agent. While one of them was driving to the airport, the other could have called and booked the ticket over the phone. That way they would have been able to just checkin and go.

The same thing is a good idea if you miss a flight or your flight is canceled. If you wait in line then all the seats on other flights will be gone by the time you get to the front of the line. If you call while waiting in line then you essentially will skip the whole line. Stay in the line just in case because sometimes the seats will be grabbed by the agent at the airport gate and inaccessible to the phone agent. Also, the agent at the airport is dealing with maybe 100 people who all are trying to get another flight and s/he is probably losing interest in going out of his/her way to find a solution. The phone agent is probably bored of routine purchases and might enjoy trying to help you as a break in the monotony if you are nice on the phone.
Naruki said @ 9:16am GMT on 13th Apr
I guess it goes without saying that you need to know the number of a sales agent. Hopefully you can get 411 or internet lookup.
Naruki said @ 9:18am GMT on 13th Apr
Jesus, cobb, you are STILL revenge modding even though this is an entirely different thread? The fuck is wrong with your head, son?
atter_cob said @ 9:44am GMT on 13th Apr
Just one "b", not two.

jaxtraw said @ 12:18pm GMT on 13th Apr
You could get a directory number before setting out, or look up a sales agent number before setting out. If you've forgotten to do that, you could phone a friend or family to get a sales agent's number.
Silent said @ 10:47am GMT on 13th Apr
I know it sounds shitty but I can understand why the clerk got so jaded, she probably had a dozen people a day trying to push upon her the urgency with which they need their flight rushed through.
But then there should have been another agent taking over who the couple could have dealt with less of a "No help" more of a "I'm on break but So-and-so will get you what you need.."
utah said @ 10:52am GMT on 13th Apr [Score:5 Underrated]
I want you to imagine - just for a second - how many dead grandmother stories ticketing agents hear each week. I will guarantee you that nine out of ten people turning up late to a flight have a sob story about a sick relative; some of these may be true. If the agent reacted without sympathy, it could be she's just sick of this shit.

Oh, and a hearty "fuck you" to Consumerist for printing Mike's email without doing any background checking. Was there a funeral in Portland for Mike's girlfriend's mom? Does Mike even have a girlfriend? Does Mike hold a valid ticket for the flight involved? Or is he just an asshole, trying to lever free flights out of United? And is it such a time-critical story that you can't call the airline for their side before you post? Fuck you, Consumerist. And fuck all of you mouth-breathers who are upmodding what could well be some random asshole's grab for free air miles.
ethanos said @ 11:55am GMT on 13th Apr
My ire at airlines knows no bounds, but I agree with you on this. Weird post that smacks of disingenuity.

I STILL however consider the idiotic no-liquids thing and ridiculous screening thing a complete waste of everybody's time and congesting airport lobbies. And I have yet to see instructions online on how to make a bomb out of Gatorade.
Tirade said @ 1:04pm GMT on 13th Apr [Score:2 Funny]
That's because Gatorade is already da bomb, yo.
arrowhen said @ 9:48pm GMT on 13th Apr
It's just "G" now.
mwoody said @ 4:41am GMT on 14th Apr
Wait, is that what those commercials with random black-and-white assholes scrolling by while some rapper who can barely speak English tries to enumerate the ephemeral qualities of "G" are about? Gatorade!?
CapnSilver said @ 1:18pm GMT on 13th Apr
I dont know about america, but in australia we have rules about hand luggage toiletries for international flights.

clear bag, no larger than an a4 sheet of paper and none of the bottles can be more than 100mL. However 200mL of a binary agent like sarin should be enough to kill everyone on the plane.
mrcucumber said @ 6:03pm GMT on 13th Apr
That's what I've said all along. It has nothing to do with explosives and everything to do with poison. The end result is the same.
zkhan said @ 4:30am GMT on 16th Apr
Airlines hate the liquids rule too. They make less money because of that rule. That is a government rule.
VictorTyne said @ 11:59am GMT on 13th Apr [Score:2 Insightful]
Maybe they should post one of those signs that says "A lack of planning on your part does not necessitate an emergency on my part."

It's nice when you're in a position to really help someone by cutting them a little slack. Shit happens. But I can't stand people like this who, when said shit does happen, expect the entire fucking world to bend over backwards for them.

Seriously, who the fuck gets in line at the airport and starts telling people "my girlfriend is upset, so can we go right to the front of this huge fucking line?" Like it's your god-given right to an airplane when something bad happens.

You know what would be postworthy? If that CEO wrote him back and told him in no uncertain terms where to shove his sense of entitlement.
jaxtraw said @ 12:14pm GMT on 13th Apr [Score:3 Underrated]
The night my mother was dying, the cab controller moved me straight to the front of the queue despite the office being full of irritated drunks, and the cab driver drove like the wind to get me to the hospice. There are many good people and kindnesses done in the world.

Of course, neither of them were working for a company who would penalise them for breaking the rules, or taking an extra time at the end of their official break to compensate for the time lost helping these people. They didn't work for a big company whose bureucratic ruleset is predicated on everyone following it. And they didn't think it was just some asshole trying to push to the front of the queue and get special treatment to compensate for their own lateness, which maybe the woman thought. How did these people try to handle the situation? Were they demanding and aggressive?

Or maybe the woman's a total fuckbitch from hell. We just don't know.
f00m@nB@r said @ 12:44pm GMT on 13th Apr
entitlement is when a customer screams at the barista for making his coffee drink the wrong way.
tiemy said @ 7:25pm GMT on 13th Apr
And yet no one has a problem with concluding that the ticket counter woman is a giant cunt from the guy's letter alone.
Janus said @ 1:24pm GMT on 13th Apr [Score:1 Informative]
Sure, the next time your mother is in a car accident, be sure to call the airlines a week in advance.
Silent said @ 1:50pm GMT on 13th Apr
As people have stated several times already, you can book by phone or online thus cutting down all the last minute hassle, I mean what if you rush and find no tickets available? Would that have been the agents fault?
Janus said @ 2:27pm GMT on 13th Apr
He did book by phone. He was a Premier member, so he called, booked the ticket, and was told to pick it up at the counter. Do people not read articles anymore? Is it me?

I agree that we don't have both sides of the story. But I'm taken aback by the responses that are directed at the author of the email in question. "He should have been prepared"? He got a call and reacted as fast as he could. "A sense of entitlement"? He and his girlfriend were five minutes away from being on that plane and on the way to see the girl's mother for the last time. They had the reservation, they were at the counter, when they're hit with a solid wall that can't be reasoned or negotiated with. Wouldn't you feel frustrated, if you were presented with this woman, who had the power to grant you a great favor—yes, a favor—and declined? Declined to do something that would mean little to her and everything to you?

Again, I agree we don't have both sides of the story. I agree that the woman at the ticket counter probably hears a hundred sob stories on a daily basis. What I don't understand is why people are immediately pointing the finger at the author of this email. Do people really think a man would write an open letter to a company like United, with a claim that has no basis in reality, just to score free tickets?
utah said @ 3:42pm GMT on 13th Apr
Well, yes. I mean, it's not on the same scale as, say, Frank Abagnale, but I think it's within the bounds of possibility.
utah said @ 3:44pm GMT on 13th Apr
Ahem. Link Mk II:
Frank Abagnale

P.S. Thanks for fixing the Lost SE page, whoever you are.
tiemy said @ 7:10pm GMT on 13th Apr
The problem isn't that he's bummed that the ticket woman didn't go above and beyond to do the guy a favor. It's that he *expected* the woman to do so to get him out a situation that was in no way her fault. When she didn't, he goes out of his way to post a letter online denouncing her as callous and selfish.

The most outrageous part is that this poor woman is probably going to take a lot of shit at work from management for doing exactly what she was legally entitled (and obligated!) to do in California, all because this prick expected someone else to make everything right when shit happens. Fuck him.
Janus said @ 8:56pm GMT on 13th Apr [Score:1 Underrated]
Above and beyond? Are you serious? It's not like the woman was asked to bend over backwards for this person. He was at the counter, she had to punch some numbers and process one ticket. All she had to do was push a few buttons. That's above and beyond? Doing her job?

So it's time for her break. Assuming the man is telling the truth, the woman proceeded to argue about the matter for ten minutes. Even considering the possibility that this figure is exaggerated, do you really think it would have taken more time to print the ticket than it did to argue over it?

And yes, I expect people to show a little human sympathy when another person is in a bad situation, especially if it doesn't require major effort on their part. If a man on crutches is hobbling to a bus stop, about to miss the bus, it's not that the driver is morally obligated to slow down, or that this man deserves to get on the bus. But I expect the bus to slow down, because I happen to assume that most people aren't cold-hearted machines.

It's not about entitlement. It's about a little thing called decency, and recognizing other people as humans.

mattrix said @ 11:05am GMT on 13th Apr [Score:1]
Maybe they should have gotten up earlier, or drove faster or visited the dying mother more before she died. People need to stop blaming other people for trying to change their destiny.
King of the Hill said @ 12:39pm GMT on 13th Apr
True.

But as much as you are aware a loved one is deathly sick, you still have your job, your bills to pay, etc. Sometimes that places you far away should something go wrong earlier than expected.

Now... why anyone would book anything but an e-ticket is beyond me.
clumsy_juggler said @ 2:31pm GMT on 13th Apr
E-tickets aren't perfect either. I had an experience where the e-ticket was several pages of text and numbers. It turned out that the first leg of the flight was a valid e-ticket and the connecting flight was only a reservation.

Of course I didn't find this out until I was removed from my seat on the connecting flight after getting a boarding pass issued, passing through the gate agent and having my luggage loaded on the plane.

Nothing on the e-ticket clearly stated that it was only a reservation and it was booked through work so I only had the printed pages to go by.
Janus said @ 1:26pm GMT on 13th Apr
Maybe they should have. And maybe the woman at the ticket counter should have taken five minutes to register a goddamn ticket. Who's to say?
mrcucumber said @ 2:19pm GMT on 13th Apr
I've had tickets processed in less than 5 minutes.
benjamander said @ 2:38pm GMT on 13th Apr
The flight was scheduled to depart at 7:50, and they got to the airport at 7:20.

He leaves out the actual time they got to the woman's mother.

He leaves out the actual time he got the call from the woman's father.


∴ shenanigans
Janus said @ 2:53pm GMT on 13th Apr
If he took the 10:30 flight, assuming they left on time, he could have gotten to Portland as fast as midnight.

He was at work when he got the call, so it's possible he got the call at noon, and was twiddling his thumbs until 7:20. Or he got the call a little closer to 7:00.

Now explain to me how this is relevant. Shenanigans in the sense that, what? He never got a call? There was no mother? He fabricated the whole story? To smear United? What is it?
benjamander said @ 7:00pm GMT on 13th Apr
He's very specific with the times that the airline could look up, but very nonspecific about the times that could vary the reader's reaction between apathy and sympathy. He also arrived at the airport half an hour before departure, which is unreasonably close to his departure time.

I'm just saying, at best, he's trying to spin this so his girlfriend blames the airline and doesn't get mad at him.
Janus said @ 9:11pm GMT on 13th Apr
What do you expect, a blow-by-blow account of every event that happened that day? As I see it, he gives the times that are pertinent to the airline. Should he have started by saying how he got the call at 6:30, left work at 6:40, and arrived home at 7 before getting to the airport in 20 minutes? How's anyone going to check this? What difference does it make?

He admits himself that it was going to be close. It's not that he expected to make it. It's just that it's a very sad outcome to a situation that could have turned out a little better.

It's not that I'm blaming the woman right away, since I don't know her story. But you really think he's trying to spin this so the girlfriend, who was there the whole time, blames the airline? Are you serious? How does that even make any sense?
loomspace said @ 3:22pm GMT on 13th Apr
Reminds me of this incident:

DALLAS -- A police officer was placed on administrative leave Thursday over a traffic stop involving an NFL player whom he kept in a hospital parking lot and threatened to arrest while his mother-in-law died inside the building.

Officer Robert Powell also drew his gun during the March 18 incident involving Houston Texans running back Ryan Moats in the Dallas suburb of Plano, police said.

"I can screw you over," he said at one point in the videotaped incident. When another officer came with word that Moats' mother-in-law was indeed dying, Powell's response was: "All right. I'm almost done."
radioelectric said @ 3:28pm GMT on 13th Apr
The terrible thing here is that the girl's mother died, not that the woman went on a break. She's going to take the heat for it anyway though.
tiemy said @ 6:55pm GMT on 13th Apr [Score:1]
People are actually agreeing with this bullshit? It was time for the woman to go on her break. You don't work on breaks, you don't work off the clock -- end of story.
foobar said @ 7:43pm GMT on 13th Apr
Ah, the lovely do-nothing union mantra.

Reasonable people will delay their breaks for reasonable reasons.
tiemy said @ 8:35pm GMT on 13th Apr
That "do-nothing mantra" is one of the main reasons you live in what's left of a fairly nice country, where you can expect to find work for more than 75 cents an hour and aren't tortured and murdered for pushing for things like higher wages and better working conditions.

And, yes, delaying your break for special circumstances shouldn't be that big of a deal. When you're working in a deliberately understaffed workplace in the deregulated utopia that is the airline industry, though, that means not getting a break -- which in turn means disciplinary action from management for going over hours.
foobar said @ 8:42pm GMT on 13th Apr
You're a clown.
tiemy said @ 9:13pm GMT on 13th Apr
I'm someone who works for a living, you fuck.
Aidentas said @ 9:15pm GMT on 13th Apr
...?
Janus said @ 9:24pm GMT on 13th Apr
Not in the service industry, one would hope.
f00m@nB@r said @ 12:13am GMT on 14th Apr
how does that make you different from the rest of us?
hildeaux said @ 8:24pm GMT on 13th Apr
I don't think you'd be saying that if you were in their shoes.

The ticket agent could have done several things to be helpful without jeopardizing herself. Anyone who still had a soul (unlikely in that line of work) would have A)at least been less of a cunt about it and B)directed them to a coworker or other resources who could have helped the customer instead of refusing outright to be any help whatsoever.

If she was really that concerned about going on her break she wouldn't have spent precious time standing there telling the customer about how she needed to go on her break.
ComposerNate said @ 8:33pm GMT on 13th Apr
Airports are filled with stressed and tired-grumpy folk. Stand in one spot and you'll see every five minutes someone in a mad rush emergency to somewhere. I'm amazed at airport employees being as civilized and unjaded as they are.
tiemy said @ 8:39pm GMT on 13th Apr
Who says she didn't do all of those things? You're basing your entire assessment of her behavior on the transparently one-sided, self-serving account that the guy pushes in his letter.
hildeaux said @ 8:56pm GMT on 13th Apr
You're basing your entire assessment of her behavior on the transparently one-sided, self-serving account that the guy pushes in his letter.

And you're not doing the same thing...how, exactly? It's all anybody can do when his letter is all we have to go by.
scojam said @ 7:29pm GMT on 13th Apr [Score:1 Underrated]
"When the employees of large companies discard compassion, respect, and common human decency and instead place their own interests in front of those they are chartered to serve, then they are no longer deserving of the public's trust."

Does anyone "trust" large companies anymore?
Aidentas said @ 9:11pm GMT on 13th Apr
Nintendo... But I'm wavering.
yasha said @ 9:34pm GMT on 13th Apr
you know, there are lots of other airlines that fly the SFO to PDX run.

why ANYONE would fly united on a route served by southwest is beyond me. especially if the trip actually matters.

SW will absolutely hold gates for passengers. and if it's the last flight of the day, they'll hold them a long, long time. i travel at least weekly, and a couple times a year im running for a flight and the last on. ive never yet missed a flight . . . its always "nice to see you mr yasha, please take your seat and we'll get going."

and if you need to go somewhere in a hurry, buy the ticket and miss the flight? no prob, SW won't charge you a dime in change fees to catch the next flight.

arrowhen said @ 9:50pm GMT on 13th Apr
I worked at a union customer service type job where employees were punished if they didn't take their breaks on time.
Dragons_wine said @ 10:06pm GMT on 13th Apr
It would have taken five minutes for that bitch to check him in and give him the tickets. She argued for ten. She could have gotten her superviser to help him. She argued. I know Airlines and CA emplyment BS* I promise she would have been just fine There's no excuse for customer service like that. I'm Not saying she needs to bend over backwards and cutoemrs can be selfentitled assholes But a little comon coutesy is nice and its a good part of what united pays her to do!

*I live and work customer service in CA. My father worked for an airline and went into aviation and emlploment law! Mom works for an airline diong Exactly this womens job!!
EPT said @ 2:23pm GMT on 14th Apr
"ten minutes" is very colloquial. The vast majority of times someone says "five" or "ten" minutes, you can bet it was a lot shorter than that. Ten minutes is quite a long time to constantly argue with someone.

I've tried to make a change in my conversation to reflect real times of events. People just look at you oddly.
eIfish said @ 5:36pm GMT on 15th Apr
Not only that, but it's actually really really difficult, if you're not trained in it, to just walk away from someone trying to complain at you. She may well have intended to walk away, but got dragged into a ten-minute long argument anyway.
mrcucumber said @ 11:03pm GMT on 15th Apr
Not if she was supposed to take her "break"
sanepride said @ 10:13pm GMT on 13th Apr [Score:1 Informative]
They got to a big airport like SFO at 7:20 and thought they could make a 7:50 flight?
No, sorry. No way. Was the ticket agent uncaring or simply being realistic about their chances of making it? First consider the distance they would have to traverse just to get to the gate. Then consider this unavoidable obstacle: TSA security checkpoint. Short lines at 7:20 pm? I don't think so. Imagine trying to rush and cajole your way past these uniformed obstructionists. Under the most ideal circumstances it would not be possible. This is just a case of misplaced, pointless anger.
Misanthrope said @ 2:30am GMT on 14th Apr
If you just go with carry on, 30 minutes is enough to get to a flight in Hartsfield, which is a shitty, bloated mess.
balzac said @ 2:43am GMT on 14th Apr
That's a different matter entirely. The entire line let them line jump out of decency, but this woman decided to go on break right then. THis may have locked her out of the computer, which may have caused an argument about doing them a solid or not, but if this was the case she should have called her supervisor as soon as the customer service broke down.

Had they gotten through her, they might have been caught in security checks and not made it, but that's a different story, and one that wouldn't have gotten an angry letter.

They may not have had a snowball's chance in hell of making that flight, but that's not the point. A decent human being does everything they can to help someone in a situation like that.
se_needs_password_recovery said @ 2:19pm GMT on 15th Apr
The break wouldn't bother me if it weren't for the fact that the airline apparently staffed the desk so that this one person's break could stop the entire line.

Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment, then click the reply link on that comment instead]

You must be logged in to comment on posts.




Members

Registered: 24545

Classifieds

Heaven666
What has been seen cannot be un-seen


BOOBLE
Search sites, pics, movies, personals.


Best Porn
Reviews of the best porn sites with pics, vids, scene desription and member area preview


LONELY GUYS
Meet Women Near You