Sensible Erection | Women's Suffrage: Scourge of the Nation

Tuesday, 31 March 2009

quote [ I realize that these laws have been passed by mostly men, but the only reason these men got elected was because they played upon the fears of women and castrated men during the election campaign. ]

The comments, many of them by women, are gold. What I want to know is, what the FUCK are they doing out of the kitchen?

[humour] [by Janus@9:08pmGMT] [+8]

Comments

Janus said @ 9:24pm GMT on 31st Mar
Actually, do have one question: the first comment says something about every Democratic victory except Johnson's (over Goldwater) being due to women, which seems to be a misquote of Ann Coulter, who said every Democratic victory since 1950, except for Johnson's, was due to women, that without the women's vote, Democrats would have lost every time except for Johnson, since 1950. True?

Anti-fuites said @ 9:58pm GMT on 31st Mar
I'm assuming they're talking about presidential elections. So that leaves Kennedy, Carter, Clinton and Obama.

I'd believe that for Kennedy and Clinton. No clue about Carter.

Women definitely voted for Obama by a wider margin than men, but according to this men also voted in favor of Obama.

So, if that's to be believed then no, untrue.

Janus said @ 10:42pm GMT on 31st Mar
Interesting. Corollary question might be, was there any instances where Republicans would have lost were it not for women's votes.

arctan said @ 11:08pm GMT on 31st Mar
Men voted for Obama, but among *white* men Obama lost convincingly.

So, y'know, if we went back to the old original rules of who should be allowed to vote none of this would be a problem.

sanepride said @ 10:36pm GMT on 31st Mar
You're taking these idiots much too seriously.

Janus said @ 10:42pm GMT on 31st Mar
It's a legitimate question. Didn't know women were predominantly Democrat, which I guess they are.

sanepride said @ 12:06am GMT on 1st Apr
Women voted in droves for Reagan and the so-called 'security moms' handed GW Bush his second term. There are two sides to the coin.

hackiavelli said @ 1:16am GMT on 1st Apr
The burden of proof lies on the claimant so it's up to Ann Coulter to back up the stupid shit she says. The fact that we use a secret ballot system in America so those stats aren't even kept should at the very least give you pause.

arctan said @ 1:20am GMT on 1st Apr
Well, we have exit polls for a reason, and every national-level candidate who wants to win elections bases their strategy around those polls.

hovercraftpilot said @ 3:15am GMT on 1st Apr
You're assuming the exit poll information your getting is honest and straight.

Since its been proven that voting machine security can be easily bypassed & in many cases there is no paper trail, any numbers of voters may have had their vote changed without their knowledge; exit polling is suspect even when the voter answers honestly.

arctan said @ 9:57pm GMT on 1st Apr
...Whaaat?

Shit, man, you got two completely different arguments cobbled together here. If anything you seem to be making an argument that exit polls are *more* accurate than the actual election, since "voting machines" are only for the election, not the exit poll -- the exit poll consists of a guy filling out a form in front of a bunch of witnesses.

sanepride said @ 1:37am GMT on 1st Apr
Also, if you're using 1950 as the starting point, remember that the Republicans have done better in national office, winning nine presidential elections compared to the Democrat's six (counting 2000 as a Republican win, even though they received fewer votes). So if women really are predominantly Democrat, clearly they aren't predominantly Democrat enough to have significantly swayed which party controls the White House.

hackiavelli said @ 5:05am GMT on 1st Apr
Women only make up 17% of Congress critters so they're not even a big enough political force to get proportional representation in the legislature.

conga said @ 9:33pm GMT on 31st Mar

We need to end women's suffrage. Women deserve better. It's sad to think that in this day and age there are still people suffraging in the world.

valen85 said @ 9:34pm GMT on 31st Mar
:-(

JOECAM said @ 9:37pm GMT on 31st Mar [Score:5 Hot Pr0n]

cdwilli1 said @ 9:42pm GMT on 31st Mar [Score:2 Underrated]
Do you know who the artist is? Would like to see more.

wyckedfae said @ 11:03pm GMT on 31st Mar
Seconded. Yesplz.

ckfahrenheit said @ 12:25am GMT on 1st Apr
the mellow-thighed chick put my spine out of place

willrogers said @ 2:04am GMT on 1st Apr
Is this supposed to be a reimagining of Cinderella?

Artist name, please.

drd69 said @ 9:39pm GMT on 31st Mar

one_inch said @ 9:40pm GMT on 31st Mar [Score:1 Funny]
This is the biggest problem with women. They so often REFUSE to even listen to a logical point.

Yep, before Women us blokes just sat around and discussed things logically without acting on emotions.
Just like that Hamlet bloke.

f00m@nB@r said @ 7:42am GMT on 1st Apr
look what happened when he tried to talk to ophelia!

JOECAM said @ 9:41pm GMT on 31st Mar

Dalej said @ 9:52pm GMT on 31st Mar
Goddamn women.
Don't they have like periods or something?

Dalej said @ 9:54pm GMT on 31st Mar [Score:1 Funny]

drd69 said @ 10:01pm GMT on 31st Mar [Score:2]

f00m@nB@r said @ 10:02pm GMT on 31st Mar
it's illegal for women to vote, therefore it's wrong!

-_- said @ 10:07pm GMT on 31st Mar
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

willrogers said @ 2:06am GMT on 1st Apr
Is Lisa staring at William Shatner on the left there?

Forsaken_One said @ 10:39am GMT on 1st Apr
I dunno, I read that as Lisa (right) is looking at the boy behind her with interest. Stephanie (left) meanwhile is staring at Lisa's tits, obviously a lot more interested in them than in any boys that may be around.

Lisa discovers she's heterosexual. Stephanie discovers the opposite.

-_- said @ 10:11pm GMT on 31st Mar [Score:4 Funny]

Dalej said @ 10:59pm GMT on 31st Mar
Dude, she's hot!
Is she single?

jamesdiemer said @ 11:30pm GMT on 31st Mar
I'm saddened by this, yet my face hurts from laughing so hard.

buzhidao said @ 12:46am GMT on 1st Apr [Score:1 Good]
does noone see mary poppins anymore?

- and -

GAAAAAH! fucking agreeable bunch of sissy cuntbags.
i'm gonna go cry myself to sleep.

noiseloop said @ 5:49am GMT on 1st Apr
+1 Cuntbags

danshyu said @ 10:16pm GMT on 31st Mar
This has to be the best trolling ever.

t_naifeh said @ 10:16pm GMT on 31st Mar [Score:1 Insightful]
Was that a New Frontiersman blog post?

shiney things said @ 11:35pm GMT on 31st Mar [Score:1 Insightful]
This hurt my brain so much, I'm smelling things that aren't there.

Nihil said @ 1:05am GMT on 1st Apr
Please have the courage to admit your bean addiction.

kang said @ 2:56am GMT on 1st Apr
Tiny strokes in the temporal lobe can do that. As well as certain atypical seizures.

BergZ said @ 12:35am GMT on 1st Apr
Eh, aren't the comments on the NorCal almost identical to the comments on the Free Republic forum regarding this blog?

hackiavelli said @ 1:33am GMT on 1st Apr
I guess I shouldn't be surprised the freepers think their rampant greed, fear, xenophobia, and misogyny is "logical".

BergZ said @ 3:31am GMT on 1st Apr
The funny thing about Free Republic is that they think of themselves as the defenders of freedom and democracy... while discussing disenfranchising an entire gender.

If only there were some way we could harness the unintentional irony.

hackiavelli said @ 4:59am GMT on 1st Apr
The best comment had to be:

"It's dangerous to make broad generalizations. But it is true."

shortstop4313 said @ 12:45am GMT on 1st Apr
Remember: There are only two emotions:

Fear and Compassion.

Think it through.

That is all.

-_- said @ 1:00am GMT on 1st Apr
icky and neato ... the driving forces of identity.

KingPellinore said @ 7:33pm GMT on 1st Apr
Horny and Not Horny - Deciding factors of whether guys get anything done or not...

Nihil said @ 1:06am GMT on 1st Apr
I could say Loathing and Craving and it would be equally true, and just as meaningless.

bruceski said @ 2:24am GMT on 1st Apr
When I'm getting a blowjob, it's not Compassion I'm feeling. Ergo I reject your thesis.

damnit said @ 2:32am GMT on 1st Apr
no, you eject your thesis.

Aidentas said @ 2:34am GMT on 1st Apr
The committee will be pleased, but extensive revision may be required.

willrogers said @ 2:59am GMT on 1st Apr
Is that from "Donnie Darko?"

I hate the people that like that movie.

Janus said @ 7:05am GMT on 1st Apr
We've been over this.
http://www.sensibleerection.com/entry.php/74837
http://www.sensibleerection.com/comment.php/74837/1526335

sherlock said @ 2:58pm GMT on 2nd Apr
I take a similar stance to this guy, except I think no one is logical enough to deserve the right to vote, myself included.

Our laws should be decided by a sufficiently powerful, sentient super-computer.

And until the day that is possible, our laws should be determined by lottery.