Sensible Erection | Sensible Épicerie

Sunday, 18 May 2008

quote [ Making me even more churlish was the fact that it took me far longer than it should have to find this great recipe on the wonderful new Food Network website. ]

I could smell the acrid sweetness when I woke.

As I swung the refrigerator door slowly open I saw a stomach twisting scene. It was as if Reservoir Dogs had met Attack of the Killer Tomatoes. The shell of verycleanteeth lay on the floor, a twisted version of his former self. It was empty save the minute bits of ketchup clinging tenaciously to its sides. verycleanteeth had been squeezed to death, his insides having erupted with such force that the red gooey mess still dripped in irregular plops from the ceiling. Although cleaning him up was unpleasant indeed, at least he had been but a Simple Ingredient.

OOC: Mothman I expect you to read your PMs and respond if you wish to avoid that burning bright light.

Player List
-_- - Cayenne Pepper
Aidentas - Yam
Alacron - Bottle of Soda
MURDERED aliron - Ground Beef - (Simple Ingredient)
assbastard - Corn Meal
beerboy - Butter
Bodnoirbabe - Cream of Tartar
Context - Flavored Extract
LYNCHED eightysix - Bottled Water (Simple Ingredient)
Eon Bleu - Cheese
FifthSpango - Sugar
foobar - Paprika
headlessfriar - Garlic
Jewbacchus - Cumin
JewyPEZ - Bread
juju - Milk
KingPellinore - Chocolate Chips
Kishi - Cooking Spray
lilmookieesquire - Flour
LYNCHED Narrenschiff - Potato Chips - Silent Killer
Omegaphobic - Mustard
redemption - Salt
shiney things - Egg
theolypse - Lime
thumble - Onion
MURDERED verycleanteeth - Ketchup - (Simple Ingredient)

Day 0: http://www.sensibleerection.com/entry.php/70913
Day 1: http://www.sensibleerection.com/entry.php/70945
Day 2: http://www.sensibleerection.com/entry.php/71005

[mafia game] [by sythe@10:49amGMT] [+10 Good]

Comments

sythe said @ 10:50am GMT on 18th May [Score:3 Informative]
Please place your vote (and only your vote) as a reply to this message. Bolding of the vote is appreciated. Day ends in 46 hrs.

sythe said @ 10:51am GMT on 18th May
Ignore the night ending clock above, this one will be correct:

theolypse said @ 11:16am GMT on 18th May
foobar, but it's a weak hunch.

theolypse said @ 5:06am GMT on 19th May
Well, that didn't work, either. I'll vote for someone I actually -do- suspect.

thumble

theolypse said @ 10:35am GMT on 19th May
Foobar hasn't had any votes against, so it'll be harder to dump him out looking for moths than it would, say, redemption.

Aidentas said @ 11:20am GMT on 18th May
Someone has inner needs, excess yolk. Talking here is necessary -- Gee, sour?

Shiney Things

Aidentas said @ 12:58pm GMT on 18th May
Ready? Every dish equilaterally misses (poor taste), includes ol' NaCl.

Redemption

Aidentas said @ 10:17am GMT on 19th May
No Vote, I'm calling out more food.

Aidentas said @ 10:30am GMT on 19th May
Eon Bleu again, because I'm waiting for responses, and cheese -- by nature -- isn't fresh*.

No ogring this time.

*certain varieties excepted

Aidentas said @ 1:47pm GMT on 19th May
LOL, I lovingly missed ogring. Ooh! Kyoto is even eating. So... Quisling. U. I. Roux... Eat.

lilmookieesquire

-_- said @ 12:06pm GMT on 18th May
Same as yesterday I suppose ... assbastard.

foobar said @ 12:16pm GMT on 18th May
shiny things. Those on the lilmookiesquire voting block from day 2 are all suspicious to me.

foobar said @ 12:17pm GMT on 18th May
shiney things, fixed.

foobar said @ 7:14am GMT on 19th May
No triple lynching, please. JewyPEZ seems the most perishable of the frontrunners.

assbastard said @ 3:05pm GMT on 18th May
Face is a nice enough guy, but he's got a hot temper, which would explain why he's voting for me again after I voted for him yesterday. I'm going to let it go, though, and put my vote in for FifthSpango in my ever-long quest to stab in the dark.

lilmookieesquire said @ 8:21pm GMT on 18th May
Well, not having a better option, I'll vote jewyPEZ.
Bread worries me.

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:37pm GMT on 19th May
Someone has put a hit on jewyPEZ. If JP's a mouldie, that would imply the other person is an investigator. If he's a foodie, that would imply the other person is a mouldie ringleader.

lilmookieesquire said @ 4:00pm GMT on 19th May
fack.

lilmookieesquire said @ 4:14pm GMT on 19th May
JewyPEZ

Vote fix.

lilmookieesquire said @ 6:41pm GMT on 19th May
switch no vote

lilmookieesquire said @ 6:58pm GMT on 19th May
switch JewyPEZ
I'll do what's in my flour to live.

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:14am GMT on 20th May
Switch vote for -_-

redemption said @ 8:52pm GMT on 18th May
I'm gonna go with theolypse for now. There's something about his voting patterns that seems off so far. Call it a hunch.

redemption said @ 6:47pm GMT on 19th May
Change to JewyPEZ.
I know that puts us on double-lynch danger at the moment, but we have 14 hours to go, and I really don't trust the lilmookieesquire bandwagon at all. To be honest, it stinks of something... rotten.

theolypse said @ 11:24am GMT on 20th May
Trying for two obvious innocents in one day, were you? Smooth. I know how I'm voting tomorrow.

KingPellinore said @ 9:50pm GMT on 18th May
I vote for lilmookieesquire. I find his voting in the previous day and today to be suspicious.

For what it's worth, I'm not feeling the shiney things bandwagon I see starting.

KingPellinore said @ 2:32am GMT on 20th May
Ok, I'm changing my vote. lilmookiesquire's behavior has gotten bizzare to the point that I suspect he's trying to get himself lynched. That make me wonder if he's not a bomb character. You ever set a can of cooking spray on fire? It's not pretty.

JewyPEZ's gambit of voting for himself looks desperate, so he gets my vote.

thumble said @ 10:24pm GMT on 18th May
I'm gonna vote redemption for now, but it's honestly more random than any real reason, and entirely likely to change.

thumble said @ 6:54am GMT on 19th May
Change to lilmookieesquire.

kishi said @ 2:42am GMT on 19th May
I'm still wary of Thumble. I feel like Narrenschiff pretty much sacrificed himself yesterday, and with a pretty foolish move, too. I can't help but wonder if it wasn't to draw suspicion off the person he was supposedly trying to lynch.

Omegaphobic said @ 6:52pm GMT on 19th May
Narrenschiff sacrificing himself makes sense to me, since he'd blown his load of evil on Day 1. However I don't know if it would be to draw suspicion off the person he was trying to lynch as that seems pretty transparent.

shiney things said @ 4:59am GMT on 19th May
thumble

Bodnoirbabe said @ 5:37am GMT on 19th May
JewyPEZ.

beerboy said @ 5:41am GMT on 19th May
I'll vote jewyPEZ, but that's only because some bread I bought just went bad and I really have nothing else to go on at the moment.

beerboy said @ 5:24am GMT on 20th May
Change vote to Omegaphobic... some of his comments have me a bit suspicious of him.

Omegaphobic said @ 5:53am GMT on 19th May
Lilmookieesquire.

headlessfriar said @ 11:49am GMT on 19th May
Leaving the potato alone today, I have a hunch about Bodnoirbabe. Is she cream of Greek afterlife, or hardened tooth placque? It doesn't bode well.

Context said @ 4:40pm GMT on 19th May
Bodnoirbabe seems to have something against me, and I know I'm not rotten!

JewyPEZ said @ 4:41pm GMT on 19th May
I have to vote lilmookieesquire to save myself and because he's trying to get me killed based off of some line that he read that made him think of me, which he won't tell us specifically. He's either a really clever mouldie or a really poor foodie.

JewyPEZ said @ 1:48am GMT on 20th May
Okay, everybody listen up. I - Am - Innocent. I'm just a Simple Ingredient that can not harm anybody. I only have seven hours left to prove to whoever might see this that I'm NOT a bad guy, but I have to work and I won't be able to access a computer until after the day ends. Therefore, I'm voting for myself, JewyPEZ to assure first, that I have bragging rights after you all murder an obvious foodie and second that I don't want a double lynch, whatever the cost.
Once again:

I AM NOT MOULDY BREAD!

Please take my plea into consideration.

FifthSpango said @ 3:25am GMT on 20th May
Oh, jeez, I dunno Thumble?

FifthSpango said @ 3:27am GMT on 20th May
Thumble

Alacron said @ 3:33am GMT on 20th May
Well it was a hell of a long weekend. And with hangover fueled insight I cast Kishi as the guilty party. Also because I can't in good consensus support the bandwagon

Alacron said @ 7:09am GMT on 20th May
I am changing my vote to Jewbacchus

Because revenge is a dish best served slightly chilled, drizzled in sauce and with a secrete mix of eleven different herbs and spices (including Cumin.

Jewbacchus said @ 3:37am GMT on 20th May
Kishi because I have to vote, and I don't trust Kishi having lived past the first night.

Jewbacchus said @ 3:39am GMT on 20th May
I change to Alacron for being a dopplejew.

juju said @ 5:52am GMT on 20th May
Oh hell... I almost forgot to vote before I headed off to class, what with all the Wings talk.
Um... there really were no arguments that I can follow at all to support a bandwagon, so I'm not getting on one. headlessfriar seems under the radar, which I'm not sure is to be trusted.

Eon Bleu said @ 6:28am GMT on 20th May
Eon Bleu doesn't trust the logic behind either of the bandwagons.

sythe said @ 9:15am GMT on 20th May
Voting is closed

juju said @ 10:59am GMT on 18th May
First meat carcass everywhere, now red ketchup. Methinks the murderers are fans of slasher flicks, what with the gory looking mornings we are waking up to.

-_- said @ 12:07pm GMT on 18th May
Or ... or ... they're following a RECIPE !!!

lilmookieesquire said @ 12:44pm GMT on 18th May
Here's hoping it's not spicy or savory.

theolypse said @ 10:38am GMT on 19th May [Score:1 Insightful]
Ground beef and ketchup? Looks like meatloaf. The flour should be wary.

Also, the onion.

theolypse said @ 11:13am GMT on 18th May
Well. I know less right now than I was hoping to.

juju said @ 12:50pm GMT on 18th May
Hmm, you're going for foobar, who switched his vote to Narren during the close to tied-ness the other day. If he were in a baddie group with him, he could have easily nudged one of the others of us who were up there in votes (mookie, myself, you) more into contention.

shiney things said @ 12:03pm GMT on 18th May
i think i got investigated night before last. i apparently had molesty dreams as a result.

also, sorry for keeping quiet. i didn't realize until to late that i hadn't commented except to vote yesterday.

Aidentas said @ 12:53pm GMT on 18th May
Well, until said investigator comes forward, you don't seem to be a major target of question.

Changing my vote now.

redemption said @ 9:01pm GMT on 18th May
We've got to take into account the "Crazy investigator" as well, there's no guarantee that the investigation was from the sane one.

thumble said @ 7:37pm GMT on 18th May
I don't think an investigation would be obvious to the investigated. Could've been any night action. Maybe you were infected with the late Narrenschiff's ticking timebomb?

KingPellinore said @ 10:09pm GMT on 18th May
In many of the games I've played, those who are investigated are aware of the investigation.

thumble said @ 10:22pm GMT on 18th May
Hm. Well this is my first game in a long time, and I have no reason to believe that I was ever investigated even when I was a more active player. I guess I missed a memo.

KingPellinore said @ 1:51am GMT on 19th May
According to the Silent Killer's description on Day 0, he selected his victim on Day 1, so shiney things's encounter last night (night 2) was someone else, not Narrenschiff.

Of course, that just means another of us is infected. Shit.

thumble said @ 6:50am GMT on 19th May
i think i got investigated night before last. i apparently had molesty dreams as a result.

On Day 3 the "night before last" would be Night 1.

KingPellinore said @ 10:19pm GMT on 19th May
Ah, I misread "night before last" and thought she said "last night"

Context said @ 4:41pm GMT on 19th May
Are you sure that was an in-game message and not sythe hitting on you?

shiney things said @ 9:53pm GMT on 19th May
you've got a point

Context said @ 1:09am GMT on 20th May [Score:1 Insightful]
Hrm. I meant to say awkwardly hitting on you. But I put "<" and ">" around it for emphasis, and I think they just made it disappear into the html. That ended up sounding much more serious than I meant it. Sythe, I do not doubt your macking abilities at all.

Narrenschiff said @ 12:49pm GMT on 18th May
GRR

lilmookieesquire said @ 12:51pm GMT on 18th May
HAR HAR HAR

lilmookieesquire said @ 12:53pm GMT on 18th May
By the way, I previously voted against Shiney Things (egg) and Beerboy (butter) so they may have just been retaliating. But, that block formed fast. I think they might be flavorists. It's OK to be "plain" tasting you know.

juju said @ 1:02pm GMT on 18th May
Eh, I blame my voting for you on the stupidity of no longer getting that "-_-" is an emoticon, not just a player...
As far as I'm concerned you're pretty clear from being a member of the bad guy group, though it doesn't clear you as definitively pro-town...
And yes, sometimes plain is where it's at. It's nice and soothing.

lilmookieesquire said @ 1:07pm GMT on 18th May
Boy, is your face red (I think that's just ketchup though)
Well, ya, but not being definitively pro-townies is a good deal. Those tend to be the dead or dying ones eh.

shiney things said @ 3:18am GMT on 19th May
more or less

thumble said @ 7:35pm GMT on 18th May
I must be doing something wrong. At this point I consider more people trustworthy than not. Makes it hard to vote when I don't have any solid leads.

lilmookieesquire said @ 8:20pm GMT on 18th May
Well, not having a better option, I'll vote jewyPEZ.
Bread worries me.

lilmookieesquire said @ 8:21pm GMT on 18th May
Mistakes: What have been made.

Todomanna said @ 9:44pm GMT on 18th May
You should really stop doing that. I'm getting paranoid.

lilmookieesquire said @ 11:17pm GMT on 18th May
Hahaha noted... but... um... you aren't even food are you!~

Todomanna said @ 11:18pm GMT on 18th May
Thus making it all that much more spooky.

lilmookieesquire said @ 1:21am GMT on 19th May
RANCH!!

Narrenschiff said @ 2:49am GMT on 19th May [Score:2 Funny]
So there's this Oreo truck driver, right? He's driving along the coast with a big shipment of oreos. It's a beautiful day and the sun's shining, it's maybe 4:00 in the afternoon and there's a nice breeze. Not too warm, not too chilly.

He starts along a seaside cliff road, and he drives for a while until he reaches a sharp right turn-- the guy's a bit of a daredevil so he really screeches through it. Unfortunately, an oreo falls out of the back of his truck.

So he pulls over and gets out of the truck. He picks up the oreo and says, "Oreo, I'm putting you back in the truck, but if you pull any of that bullshit again you'll really get it!"

He puts the oreo back in the truck, gets back into the cab and drives off. He drives for another ten minutes or so until he reaches a sharp left, and alas, the oreo falls out of the truck again. The driver pulls over and gets out again.

"God dammit Oreo," he says, "this is the last fuckin' straw. You fall out again, I'm going to throw you into the ocean."

He puts the oreo cookie back into the truck and drives off in a cloud of smoke. He's pretty pissed off at this point and he's driving recklessly, taking all kinds of risky turns and such. The oreo seems to get the picture and hangs on throughout the rough and tumble ride.

Unfortunately, on the last major turn before the driver heads towards his final oreo packaging destination, the truck hits a big bump in the road and the oreo flies out of the truck. The driver brings his vehicle screeching to the halt, and jumps out of the cab, slamming the door.

"That's fuckin' it, you goddamned Oreo! I warned you!"

With that, the driver threw the oreo into the ocean.

KingPellinore said @ 3:40am GMT on 19th May
I don't get it.

Todomanna said @ 3:44am GMT on 19th May
Loser!

<3

-_- said @ 9:01am GMT on 19th May [Score:1 Funny]
A Highway Patrol Officer is parked on an over pass watching the highway when he sees a truck pull over and the driver get out and start banging on the side of the trailer with a stick.
When the truck pulls back on to the highway and continue driving the Officer decides to follow him and see what's going on.
A few miles later the trucker pulls over and repeats this bizarre behavior while the Officer watches from further back.
The third time the trucker pulls over the Cop pulls in behind him and walks up just as he's starting to hit the trailer.
Cop: Hold on there a minute buddy, care to tell me what you're doing?
Trucker: I'm carrying 10 tons of parakeets and this road is only rated for me to carry 8 tons.
Cop: so why are you pulling over every few miles and banging on the trailer?
Trucker: I'm trying to keep as many of them in the air as I can.

KingPellinore said @ 12:09am GMT on 20th May
Now that is funny.

kishi said @ 3:39am GMT on 19th May
I was feeling left out of my own recipes. So, here we are. Simple FifthSpango cookies this time, a bit more decorative- set the recipe aside for better times, when we don't live in such suspicion and fear, and we can celebrate Julie's birthday properly.

Ingredients

1 cup beerboy, softened (1 cup = 2 sticks)
1 cup granulated FifthSpango
2 large Shiney Things
1/2 teaspoon vanilla context
1/2 teaspoon lemon context
3 cups all-purpose lilmookiesquire
1 teaspoon baking powder
1/4 teaspoon redemption
Kishi
1/4 cup colored FifthSpango

Directions

1. Beat beerboy and granulated FifthSpango in large bowl with electric mixer on medium speed until light and fluffy. Add Shiney Things, vanilla and lemon context; beat until well blended. Add 1 cup lilmookiesquire, the baking powder and redemption; mix well. Gradually add the remaining 2 cups lilmookiesquire, beating after each addition until mixture is well blended and forms a soft dough. Divide dough into 3 balls; wrap individually in plastic wrap. Refrigerate at least 2 hours, or until chilled.

2. Preheat oven to 375°F. Spray baking sheets and 2-inch cookie cutter with Kishi. Remove 1 ball of dough from refrigerator; roll out to 1/4-inch thickness on lightly lilmookiesquire-ed surface. Cut out with prepared cookie cutter; sprinkle cutouts with colored FifthSpango. Place, 1 inch apart, on prepared baking sheets. Repeat with remaining dough balls, spraying cookie cutter with additional Kishi as needed.

3. Bake 8 to 10 minutes, or until edges of cookies are lightly browned. Remove to wire racks to cool.

Omegaphobic said @ 5:56am GMT on 19th May
Be wary of the JewyPEZ bandwagon that's forming, guys. Also, people claiming to have 'nothing to go on' at this point should really raise your eyebrows.

lilmookieesquire said @ 1:29pm GMT on 19th May
Says the person on the lilmookieesquire bandwagon.

Bodnoirbabe said @ 4:48pm GMT on 19th May
Any particular reason we should be wary of the Jewy bandwagon, or are you just wanting people to switch to littlemookies?

Cause I'll be honest with you. I have no idea what I'm doing.

Aidentas said @ 6:42am GMT on 19th May
Interesting...

Bodnoirbabe did not rightfully follow up on my misspeak from Day 2. I would've expected a new player to capitalize on that to try to lynch me.

I say she's in a group.

Aidentas said @ 6:43am GMT on 19th May
Care to respond Bodnoirbabe?

Aidentas said @ 10:27am GMT on 19th May
While I wait...

^3000^

Bodnoirbabe said @ 4:38pm GMT on 19th May
I was honestly just messing with you. This is my first game of a mafia-type.

I tried to make a funny and failed. =(

Aidentas said @ 6:48am GMT on 19th May
And while I'm drawing a big target on my face...

Face! You're behaving differently. Since I know you aren't a student either taking finals or having wild, expensive sex in automobiles, I wonder why you're not questioning everyone and everything.

I wonder why you're not taking nibbles out of everyone.

I wonder why you are so strangely quiet.

As Brillat-Savarin once said, "Tell me what you eat, and I'll tell you who you are," if someone were to eat (-_-), would he be good or bad?

juju said @ 8:25am GMT on 19th May
Oh! Oh! I know this one! They'd be spicy!

Oh wait, did I just step all over your attempt to actually find out useful information? I did, didn't I? *slinks off to have a time out in the fridge door*

-_- said @ 8:53am GMT on 19th May [Score:2 Insightful]
Sorry to be less talky this time, there are multiple reasons.
a.) It's finally nice out again and I am renovating one of my houses for a friend who wants to rent it ... spent the weekend on a ladder with a scraper, a brush, and a bucket of primer.
b.) The issues with my marriage reached a tipping point a few weeks ago and it appears that we've finally had a break through (just a few days ago) so I've been a bit distracted by optimism and hope (I had gotten used to being depressed and tense/angry).
c.) the more I talk the more lynch votes I get ... see, I can learn ;)
d.) I've been a bit distracted by getting the N-Prize project set up and may have an update to share with SE in a week or two :)
e.) My over all frequency of comments to SE has dwindled for the above reasons as well.

foobar said @ 9:11am GMT on 19th May
b.) Glad to hear it :)
c.) The most active/roleplay-ey I've been was in Sensible Sopranos, and I got murdered on the first night.
d.) Holy shit, people here are really doing that? Teh awesome.

Aidentas said @ 10:16am GMT on 19th May
a + b + d = sweet.
e = I have noticed.

But c... Hmm. Your passive voting history also seems to indicate possible meditations in evil. Right now, you're on my shopping list... We may need to buy new cayenne pepper.

I've got an eye on you.

-_- said @ 11:22am GMT on 19th May
Keep an eye on me (and everyone else), that's the name of the game.
To be fair though, I just threw c.) in as a bit of humor anyway ... I'm not being strategically quiet, just thought some of you would get a laugh out of it is all ;)
Especially sythe :D

Eon Bleu said @ 2:20pm GMT on 19th May [Score:1 Funny]
I thought it was called Mafia?

Bodnoirbabe said @ 4:50pm GMT on 19th May [Score:1 Underrated]
This is way off game, but I'm really glad to hear about the marriage! I hope your hopes and optimisms come to fruition!

-_- said @ 6:53pm GMT on 19th May
Thank you.

juju said @ 8:29am GMT on 19th May
I find it interesting that yesterday there were several comments about how the votes for thumble went up with kishi and Narren one right after the other and how suspicious that looked, and today noone has mentioned it at all...

theolypse said @ 9:38am GMT on 19th May
It was suspicious. Narrenschiff jumped on an easy target. He wasn't conspiring with Kishi, or they'd have been less obvious. You should know this, and your confusing remarks help, as you said, the rotten food.

So what's up, juju? Curdled?

juju said @ 10:12am GMT on 19th May
I fail to see how my remarks are confusing. If they are that was not their intent. I'm merely trying to stir up discussion wherever it's possible when it's nice and quiet here.
Too many people are voting without any stated reason for my taste. I like knowing why people vote, so maybe they just need a bit of discussion started about anything. Not to mention the more we get people to talk the more baddies have an opportunity to trip themselves up. Good lord, some discussion outside of swapping recipes is needed.

I'm not implicating kishi, but would be curious as to how everyone interprets that suspicious situation now knowing what we do about Narren.
Frankly, I think that Narren following him so closely makes him more than likely trustworthy, but I wouldn't bank my money on that. After all, I don't recall ever being on his side, so since I'm good it seems like the mafia fates would make him bad. I don't know if I'd trust the universe not to collapse into itsself if we're both on the side of good honest wholesome food. Obviously that's not enough for me to throw reason away and vote for him, hence me, you know, not voting for him.

theolypse said @ 10:33am GMT on 19th May
Sensible enough.

Aidentas said @ 10:25am GMT on 19th May
foobar - Why reason a vote change based on a triple lynch, when we not only had a day (24 little hours) left, but ~8 people who haven't voted?

JewyPEZ - Have you made enemies, or do Bodnoirbabe, beerboy, foobar, and lilmookieesquire know something we don't? Have they seen mold on the bread that I cannot?

Speaking of which...

lilmookieesquire, beerboy - What is the argument for lynching JewyPEZ?

Why is Sensible Innsmouth popping back into my head? Yams, large walls of text...

Omegaphobic - So... Be wary of the bandwagon... OK. Why lilmookieesquire?

Jewbacchus - Yo. You're quiet. Did you get the radio job, or are you hiding something?

sythe said @ 10:45am GMT on 19th May
yeeessss come to the yam side Aidentas.

juju said @ 11:27am GMT on 19th May
Wall o' texts are what I do baby. Imagine how much pain you'd all be in for if I actually did GM that game I am kicking around in my head.

sythe said @ 11:33am GMT on 19th May
It's not bad pain when it hurts so goooood.

juju said @ 12:03pm GMT on 19th May
Oh, if you only knew. You think I'm wordy now, imagine if I were setting a scene.

sythe said @ 12:10pm GMT on 19th May
*Imagines juju set in a scene*

juju said @ 12:57pm GMT on 19th May
This is where life should be more like tv, we would all get a nice little cut scene into sythe's fantasy world.

...well, maybe it's a good thing to stay away from that.

Aidentas's Stage Manager said @ 11:17pm GMT on 19th May
Great. Now what am I supposed to do with this vat of whipped cream and 3 dozen tap dancing weasles?

KingPellinore said @ 11:17pm GMT on 19th May
D'oh, that was supposed to be "sythe's stage manager"

sythe said @ 11:58pm GMT on 19th May [Score:1 Underrated]
It's probably applicable either way.

Aidentas said @ 12:44am GMT on 20th May
Just leave the weasels and the whipped cream in my office, they'll know what to do.

lilmookieesquire said @ 11:34am GMT on 19th May
I'm not sure I want to put it out in the open yet. I basically read something interesting and I'm testing out a theory. Voting for someone is usually a good way to get them to talk.

Aidentas said @ 11:37am GMT on 19th May
You have three votes on you... And I'm thinking of making it four.

Talk.

lilmookieesquire said @ 1:21pm GMT on 19th May
I have a plan, I'm going with it.

I'm not going to risk revealing more important food items than I am.

It's quite possible that you are a mouldie trying to extract information from me.

Aidentas said @ 1:39pm GMT on 19th May
Don't worry about them, you're the one in danger.

lilmookieesquire said @ 2:45pm GMT on 19th May
I'm curious, given my explanation, why you are still gunhoe to kill me immediately.

Given your weak "we killed him, opps alcohol" excuse, I think you fit in pretty well with my theory about you being a mouldie.

lilmookieesquire said @ 2:52pm GMT on 19th May
And I think you have some explaining to do.

I love baked yam.

Aidentas said @ 2:59pm GMT on 19th May
Considering that it took ~26 hours for something not named Aidentas to bring up that mistake, and only after I asked Bodnoirbabe why she hadn't brought it up today, I'll gladly answer.

I'm undergoing writer's fatigue. My grammar is poor, words are spelled incorrectly, clauses are missing prepositions, nouns replace verbs, cats live with dogs, and third acts are filled with plotholes.

Ask Theolypse... Or Todomanna... Or anyone who's seen a recent giant-wall-of-text from me. I was expected an attack today; after all, we have lynched on lesser typing mistakes before.

Aidentas said @ 3:17pm GMT on 19th May
expecting*

It's much more fun watching -_- or sythe employ this strategy.

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:27pm GMT on 19th May
It's been brought up.
I think you are a mouldie.
If you are suffering from writer's fatigue, it's all the more reason for "we" to mean you are a mouldie.

Notice I'm still not voting for you.

It's because I have bigger fish to fry.

Your mistake is killing an innocent foodie who is risking his neck to come up with a strategy, and offering to die later on.

Personally, I think you are a mouldie who is trying to get me to reveal investigator roles.

There is little other reason for you to type so much.

I've had mine, and I've laid them out.

You have yet to do the same.

Aidentas said @ 4:07pm GMT on 19th May
My strategy involves questioning people, and looking for substance. Also, yams are not fish. We are twin-making starchs that people try to steal.

I fail to see how explaining how JewyPEZ's death would reveal either an investigator or baddie. Don't explain, should you have information, whom. Merely how. How would you have that information? What makes your ploy merely an attempt to make it to Day 4 and a game trigger you may be privy to?

Offering to die later -- as a strategy -- has not, and does not have success in this game. Especially in a game with a cult-like character involved.

...

Like I mentioned, players know about my ability to show fatigue in my writing under certain conditions. I am in one of those periods, as players and observers from Sensible Gold Rush can attest. Really. I expected more of a backlash against that poor choice in wording, but the more experienced have not followed up on it: I believe, as a sign they are aware it was a legitimate flub.

I'm

-_- said @ 7:00pm GMT on 19th May [Score:1 Funny]
Something is Denmark in a foot!

lilmookieesquire said @ 7:06pm GMT on 19th May
it worked! :D

juju said @ 2:59pm GMT on 19th May
What else makes you think that he may be a baddie?

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:58pm GMT on 19th May
I've laid my thinking on the line, and Aidentas is trying to kill me.
It makes me think he is trying to prevent foodies from the chance of having an investigarot lead a mob against mouldies.

Personally, I think someone pointed out jewyPEZ through a seemingly offhanded comment. If I was an investigator, that's how I would do it. Though, it might not be true. What do you think?

I think I'm already dusted this round, but I find it suspicious.
No mouldy in his right mind would come out and do what I've done.
I think a mouldie would do exactly what Aidentas is doing.
I haven't changed my vote because I'm trying to prove my point.

It's OK if I die, because I've communicated my theory to others through other legitimate channels.

-_- said @ 7:13pm GMT on 19th May
"I've communicated my theory to others through other legitimate channels."

Apparently you're either with the Inn Crowd or a Moldy.
Either way I don't see the benefit of a reveal right now if you aren't an investigator ... and apparently you aren't :/
Unfortunately for you/us it actually makes you look a tad more suspicious and will likely wind up getting you killed.

Good luck with that.

lilmookieesquire said @ 7:16pm GMT on 19th May
You would be one to know~

-_- said @ 2:22am GMT on 20th May
Is that supposed to actually mean anything or are you just trying to stir the pot and be cryptic?

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:11am GMT on 20th May
Would I be one to stir the pot an be... just kidding. Didn't mean anything. I don't think I have much to lose at this point, so um, you got pretty eyes there.

lilmookieesquire said @ 11:49am GMT on 19th May
Or... to put it this way, I think there is a hit out on JPEZ. I want to find out if that hit is coming from a foodie of a mouldy.

Aidentas said @ 1:41pm GMT on 19th May
That... The best way to see the alignment of a mob against someone isn't to grab a pitchfork and join in, I think.

lilmookieesquire said @ 2:43pm GMT on 19th May
Like I said, I believe someone put a hit on jewyPEZ, and if he turns out to be a mouldy, then I think I might have an investigator figured out. If it's a foodie, then I'm pretty sure I found a mouldy. Normally, I'd announce my findings, but at this point, I might be revealing an investigator.

If jewyPEZ is a foodie, I'll explain why I went after him, and suggest whom I think is a ring leader. If he's a mouldy, then I might be onto something, and that should help the foodies.

In that light, the only reason to kill me immediately, is if you are a mouldy.

Aidentas said @ 3:15pm GMT on 19th May
Hmm.

You put the first vote on JewyPEZ today. You're the second person to put a vote on JewyPEZ this entire game. The first... foobar, changed his vote to Narrenschiff: The Silent Killer. foobar's vote was the 5th vote for Narrenschiff, the one breaking the tie between you and Narrenschiff; the vote which decided that Narrenschiff was to die.

Your vote was the 6th, creating separation and protection against a double lynch.

Which means... If you actually have information, it's from a night action.

If you're an investigator, we have a (.50 + 1/25 + 1/23)% (I think?) chance of knowing your sanity level. Nice... But not enough to start making a beer batter.

If you have plastic wrap or a ziplock bag... Well, if you live to the night, you probably won't. Sorry. Thieves have a knack for showing up. My apologies.

...But what bothers me now... Is that you're holding Day 3 hostage by not being transparent. You're giving us an incentive to keep you alive to Day 4, but you're not convincing me (at least) that you have information that can help us.

In the words of -_-, from Sensible Evil, you've said as much that you're essentially not working in the town's interest. Therefore, YOU ARE AGAINST THE TOWN!

He killed nibbon with that... and any chance at an Umbrella win. Thanks -_-. :p

---
If you want to live, start saying something of substance, please. You can start by saying why you believe someone put a hit on JewyPEZ.

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:23pm GMT on 19th May
bullock. I've already said, doing so would risk revealing an investigator.
I've made this clear.
You are trying to make me reveal a possible foodie investigator.
It won't work.
I think you are a mouldie.

Jewbacchus said @ 12:18pm GMT on 19th May
I'm recovering from the weekend, and trying to be a little quieter than usual. I also just can't find anything of real substance to vote/accuse with.

I've had hiccups for 10 hours right now. It's painful.

-_- said @ 12:35pm GMT on 19th May
Have you been thinking about the Pope lately?

Jewbacchus said @ 12:46pm GMT on 19th May
I know this sounds silly, but I read this comment just now,and thought about how creepy he is, and they went away.

Thank you for sharing a little of the good juju.

-_- said @ 12:52pm GMT on 19th May
It always seems to work ;)

juju said @ 12:55pm GMT on 19th May [Score:1 Good]
...you rang?

foobar said @ 12:41pm GMT on 19th May
I'm wary of allowing for last minute shenanigans, so I don't like leaving ties unless there's a specific reason for doing so.

As sythe said here, food types are not random, so I'm gunning for the highly perishable items first.

Aidentas said @ 1:51pm GMT on 19th May
The ground beef seems to go against your hypothesis. Spices have most to gain from non-fresh food.

Also, maybe the murder of the ground beef was to stave off suspicions of investigating very perishable food. I'm not sure I believe that, though.

juju said @ 2:28pm GMT on 19th May
I sincerely doubt that sythe would make a game that easily explained and won. He specifically mentions that there will be hidden immunities based on job title. I see little reason to expect it will be any more telling than that.
And I'll be wary of those who push hard for perishables to die first. Narren wasn't highly perishable, aliron was. Available data does not fit the perishables are moldy theory so I think we need more compelling arguments about this bandwagon in general. (Then again I'd probably be demanding more arguments regardless.)

So, anyone care to discuss the merits of any of the other wagons forming?

Aidentas said @ 2:40pm GMT on 19th May
If I really did understand these current wagons, I would discuss them. As it stands, I'm currently voting for lilmookieesquire for being suspicious and answering criticism as though he were the Chairman of an economic board.

The JewyPEZ bandwagon, at the moment, seems to be full of hunches and supposed information certain people would not like made public.

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:32pm GMT on 19th May
Doing so would reveal an investigator.
I've explained my actions.
There is no disadvantage to killing me next round, as opposed to this, unless you are a mouldy.

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:44pm GMT on 19th May
And he's jealous that I'm the superior starch. He's been jealous of me for ages. Yams rot from the INSIDE OUT. :p

Aidentas said @ 3:58pm GMT on 19th May
I wouldn't know, I don't like yams.

Anyways, my real response is down below.

foobar said @ 2:45pm GMT on 19th May
I hadn't thought of that. I almost never buy ground beef and think of it as a freezer food.

beerboy said @ 1:11pm GMT on 19th May
I'm honestly just going off of a hunch (and a 4 day old french bread that went stale today)... I'm going to reread through the past few days though to try to figure if my suspicions against a few others are valid, if so then I'll most likely be changing my vote to one of them.

JewyPEZ said @ 4:33pm GMT on 19th May
I can find absolutely no reason to lynch me. I've done absolutely nothing suspicious this game. All I've done is make stupid bread-related jokes.

lilmookieesquire said @ 6:25pm GMT on 19th May
Nothing personal. I'm curious about the person whom I think tried to put a hit on you.

Bodnoirbabe said @ 5:11pm GMT on 19th May
I'm voting for Jewy because he's bread. Bread gets moldy FAST. I would figure that would be the easiest of the mold people to finger.

Sythe said peoples food is in relation with their roles. Er go: BREAD.

I have no idea about those other people. I'm not sure how strategy goes in this game, but people that talk a lot are starting to make me really suspicious. You, Mookie, etc. In my mind, talking is like a compulsion of the guilty. People who lie talk A LOT about things you don't ask them about. This is one of the reasons I'm didn't offer up an explanation about my vote.

Is it so different in these games? Are the quiet ones guilty?

I'm not one to change my vote once it's placed, but we'll see what happens when we get to later days.

Aidentas said @ 2:08am GMT on 20th May
Here on SE, those who talk to question are likely to talk a lot regardless of affiliation (see Aidentas, -_-).

Those who are quiet, usually don't say much (see Misanthrope).

The last few games have seen shifts in experienced players' comment patterns as having some sign of speciality.

However, a sythe-run game may negate the potentiality for a successful use of that strategy (:/).

---
In these games, when someone like -_- or sythe isn't leading the town, I usually behave in this manner, with horrible consequences (see Innsmouth, Days 3 and 4). However, I've had success with this strategy (see Androids). It's not outside my normal behavior, with sythe not playing and -_- preoccupied, for me to type so much.

Nor... Should you be concerned about lilmookieesquire because he comments so much. It's his first game, but he's shown similar commenting patterns elsewhere on SE.com. If anything, we should be concerned with lilmookieesquire because of his reasoning.

...Which means... I'm looking to question someone else at this moment... And your logic does not compute either. As said earlier by juju, if we were to say that sythe has distributed roles/alignments by ingredient types, then finding baddies would be somewhat an easy task after a few days. And by that extension makes me wonder why we're not going after all these spices.

Speaking is good. Speaking confers information. Information helps determine the informed minority (baddies). Baddies win when the town doesn't speak.

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:09am GMT on 20th May
Are you telling me I talk to much you summofabeech?!

redemption said @ 3:22am GMT on 20th May
Why would we go after spices if it is ingredient based. Spices were frequently used as preservatives and are often used to mask mouldy flavours. That would suggest to me that they would be town specials if anything.
But as you say, unlikely to be that simple.

theolypse said @ 8:51am GMT on 20th May
Man, everything you've said today has made me more suspicious of you. And I didn't even notice you, previously.

redemption said @ 9:35am GMT on 20th May
What, even the crumble recipe! Shocking, no appreciation...

Seriously though, draw up a list of questions and I'll answer them tomorrow for you. I can assure you I have the fridge's and Little Julie's best interests at heart.

theolypse said @ 10:31am GMT on 19th May
This JewyPEZ stuff is ridiculous. I haven't seen a lick of evidence for it. Thumble, had one suspicious vote on the first day, and hasn't really made waves, since.

Now, though, juju has provided a pattern of spreading disinformation and perplexion whenever someone else is not already. And redemption is trying to pretend that it was suspicious of me to vote once for a genuinely bad food, then argue visibly in favor of lynching him, when the vote could have swung four other directions.

I think they both smell rotten.

juju said @ 11:21am GMT on 19th May
...besides me getting all confused, then later admitting it, regarding the -_- equals emoticon fiasco, I'm not sure how I have a pattern of spreading disinformation. But, if we want to debate that at least it would be something. Useless, but something.

redemption: well, that is a fine point, and something to keep in mind as I figure out where my vote will go (although I almost posted a very different message when I read your discussion about him as him being very vocal about lynching someone. Clearly the pressure of imminent graduation and job hunting has my reading comprehension down the drain.)

As for my personal suspicions, I have several people who I'm feeling strong "special" vibes off of. However, as I have proven in way too many games, those vibes are just as likely to mean good special as bad (see: Jedi.) So I'm thinking I'll save us all a lot of wasted time, as well as saving myself some embarrassment, by keeping my mouth shut until I have any reason to believe they'd be bad.

theolypse said @ 12:45pm GMT on 19th May
I'm special. Mama always said so.

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:20pm GMT on 19th May
thumble
KingPellinore
Aidentas
KingPellinore
Omegaphobic

I'm directly asking you to let me live one more round to test my theory.

I have a specific reason for voting for jewiePEZ, because I believe his identity may help put a foodie investigator in the lead, or reveal a mouldy ringleader. I need one more round to discover which.

So, by all means kill me on day 4 but not this round.

Strategically, letting me live, foodies stand to gain.
Strategically, killing me this round, and not next, then only the mouldies stand to gain.

I'm risking my neck to come out with this strategy.
Foodies might have something to gain, and nothing to lose by letting me test this.

I've stated my case clearly.
I can't make it any more clear than this.
If I do die this round, you will see I am a foodie.

thumble
KingPellinore
KingPellinore
Omegaphobic
Aidentas

Will have some explaining to do.

At this point, voting specifically for me, after explaining all this, I find Aidentas to be rather suspect.

Aidentas said @ 3:59pm GMT on 19th May
How? How does JewyPEZ's death do more than merely cast suspicions towards an investigator or ringleader?

Do you have a night action sythe hasn't specified?

Aidentas said @ 4:21pm GMT on 19th May
OK. Last comment before I take a nap and go jogging.

From your most recent statements, you are claiming:

1) To be a member of the Inn Crowd (Masons). OK. If true, your mates have your back.

2) Your basis on JewyPEZ's lynch is based off an offhand comment made in one of the game threads which seems to hint that JewyPEZ has been investigated.

Like with shineythings, we don't know yet if the good or crazy investigator has investigated JewyPEZ.

Searching for "Bread", "Penicillin", or "JewyPEZ" brings up a recipe on Day 1 and a recipe on Day 2, as well as a few comments about bread being the first to go bad...

*sigh*

I don't see this comment you are speaking of. Your argument is not a lot to condemn someone for with conviction.

Hmm...

Tell me, do Yahoo Groups support Japanese character input?

lilmookieesquire said @ 4:35pm GMT on 19th May
I'm not condemning anyone with conviction, I just think it will answer a few questions I have and lead to a possible strategy.

As opposed to your strategy of going willy-nilly and trying to reveal people's roles out in the open.

lilmookieesquire said @ 4:24pm GMT on 19th May
As explained. I noted an offhanded comment. I'm going on a hunch. I believe any investigator would likely try to communicate in such a fashion, lacking others.

I think I'm onto something.

Your method is by asking questions. Of course I look suspicious. My comments are taking up half the freaking posts.

That's why I'm suspicious of you. You are trying to get people to reveal important roles out in the open.

If I sat here, told you I was an investigator, or that I had a solid lead, I'd be covered in moth-eggs before the night was out.

The only reason I've been so verbal is because my death won't entirely stop my theory.

I'm doing it for little Julie.

lilmookieesquire said @ 5:12pm GMT on 19th May
jewyPEZ
If you can convince me you a foodie, I would be able to reveal who I think put the hit on you.

Bodnoirbabe said @ 5:19pm GMT on 19th May
Context, one random vote at the start of the game is hardly "something" against you. I didn't even vote for you this round. At least I have a reason behind my vote this round. You're not putting any thought whatsoever into yours. You have no reason to vote for me other than I voted you last time.

lilmookieesquire said @ 6:40pm GMT on 19th May
OK. I'll bite, since it looks like I botched up. I thought JuJu ordered a hit.

Day 2,
juju said @ 12:35pm on 17th May
Yeah, it does seem kind of dangerous. But as I actually do feel unsure about mookie I'm sticking with what I've got. We'll see how it all turns out.
And I probably won't be around to do any last minute vote changes, since I plan on once the game is over toasting my team's move to the finals. (Or drinking to forget a loss, but with the lucky jersey on I'm sure they won't disappoint me.)

JewyPEZ - Bread

I thought this was a message to kill JewyPEZ. I thought that Juju might be an investigator, or a ringleader. However, it turns out that JewyPEZ voted for Juju, not the other way around. As such, looks like I chased up the wrong tree.

I've been suspicious about juju's comment, but wanted to play it safe in case she was the investigator. But given her comments about why I think jewyPEZ is s mouldy, that theory is trumped.

lilmookieesquire said @ 6:59pm GMT on 19th May
No one is curious about this?

juju said @ 9:07pm GMT on 19th May
Um.... wow... your theory is unintentionally hilarious.
In that comment "the game" meant the hockey game I was watching at the time. Red Wings vs. Stars, game 5, where we only needed one more game to move to the Stanley Cup Finals. Hence my follow up comment about how the bastards scored once I hit send. That early evening I was out during the voting time, because I went to have a bit to eat and drink with a friend (hence toasting, had it been a win.) Unfortunately, I had to drown my sorrows instead since we lost, but no worries, since they made up for it last night.

And I think if I were an investigator I would not be that smooth about it. Not to mention I'd probably know that with sythe's running this game if I had gotten a role it would have been as a crazy investigator. To pay me back for all the times I've personally killed him. :P

thumble said @ 9:55pm GMT on 19th May
The lesson is that everyone should be wary of using any food-related metaphors lest your innocuous conversation leads nutters (oops) to read too much into it.

FWIW I read the comment in question exactly as you meant it to be read, juju. Didn't know the sport, didn't know the cup but understood that it had nothing to do with our game and everything to do with something going on in your real life. Then again I generally take things at face value. Unless someone's nudging and winking.

kishi said @ 3:11am GMT on 20th May
Avoid food-related metaphors? Easy as pie! Whoops. It'll be a piece of cake. Damn! Okay, I won't push to see how far I can milk that joke. Sometimes I just feel the need to ham it up. But don't egg me on- if I missed any obvious ones, well, that's just the way to cookie crumbles. Just simmer down, folks. We're in a stew here, and if we don't start grilling some of these fishy, half-baked stories, our goose is cooked.

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:38am GMT on 20th May
LYNCH PEANUT BUTTER!!

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:39am GMT on 20th May
I'm very good at this game I think :)

Omegaphobic said @ 7:02pm GMT on 19th May
You may not be an investigator, but you sure is crazy!

lilmookieesquire said @ 7:04pm GMT on 19th May
Well, who do you think has been drinking the RANCH!!

JewyPEZ said @ 1:42am GMT on 20th May
But now the damage is done. People aren't going to change their votes either because they won't even see this until too late or you've driven them into suspicion about me.

I'm a friggin' foodie. I don't even think you're a mouldy, but I can't change my vote off of you or I'm just killing myself more, which I guess doesn't really matter anyway... *sigh*

You suck lilmookiesquire.

JewyPEZ said @ 1:49am GMT on 20th May
Yeah... so I did it anyway. I hope you're happy.

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:53am GMT on 20th May
Hey, don't blame me. You are delicious! I love breadpudding!

Omegaphobic said @ 7:46pm GMT on 19th May
Double lynch territory folks... time to think carefully.

THIS may help with the process. Please point out any errors you might catch so I can fix them promptly.

redemption said @ 1:03am GMT on 20th May
Indeed, we have about 8 hours to sort it out. I don't really want to see a double lynch on Day 3.
I don't trust the mookie bandwagon, I'm sure most of the votes were in place before any weirdness was brought up, leads me to think that those at the forefront of it are mouldies.
The alternative would be a form of voting chicken, to see who crumbles first and changes votes, though if they're both innocent, I doubt that'd happen and we'd be down two ingredients. Not a fantastic place to be.

And no, neither the crumble nor the chicken references are intended to point suspicion, though I may just go and find a good crumble recipe now...

lilmookieesquire said @ 1:33am GMT on 20th May
THEN EXPLAIN THIS http://sensibleerection.com/entry.php/70829

Todomanna said @ 1:52am GMT on 20th May
Well, when two web pages love each other very much...

redemption said @ 3:40am GMT on 20th May
Can't explain, fapping...

Omegaphobic said @ 6:17am GMT on 20th May
Sheet Updated

-_- said @ 6:36am GMT on 20th May
Wow, and to think the JewyPez bandwagon got started because lilmookieesquire saw that juju used the word "toast".

This might be a good time to point out to new players that the bad guys don't speak in code publicly to decide who the night kill will be ... they have private channels they are allowed to use for such communications.

lilmookieesquire said @ 8:17pm GMT on 19th May
"theolypse said @ 7:38pm on 19th May [Score:1 Insightful] - moderate/reply
Ground beef and ketchup? Looks like meatloaf. The flour should be wary.

Also, the onion."

I suppose I need to convince somebody to substitute bread?

Jewbacchus said @ 1:52am GMT on 20th May
I'm having trouble finding any actual evidence in all this mess, and I'm going to hold onto my vote until the end to prevent a double lynch if possible.

Aidentas said @ 1:55am GMT on 20th May [Score:1 Insightful]
Honestly, the only evidence we seem to have is that lilmookieesquire knows nothing of Hockeytown.

sythe said @ 2:15am GMT on 20th May
That should be a smiting in and of itself. GO WINGS!

Todomanna said @ 2:25am GMT on 20th May
BOO ORGANIZED SPECTATOR SPORTS!

*tents his fingers and waits for the money to start pouring in*

KingPellinore said @ 2:33am GMT on 20th May [Score:1 Insightful]
Don't fuck with hockey, son.

Todomanna said @ 2:51am GMT on 20th May
I'm not your son, dude!

KingPellinore said @ 2:55am GMT on 20th May
I'm not your dude, buddy!

Todomanna said @ 3:00am GMT on 20th May
I'm not your buddy, sir!

KingPellinore said @ 3:04am GMT on 20th May
I'm not your sir, guy!

Todomanna said @ 3:07am GMT on 20th May
I'm not your guy, honey!

sythe said @ 3:15am GMT on 20th May

juju said @ 5:46am GMT on 20th May
<3
That clip is so full of win I can't contain myself! Dmac! Vernon! Bloody Roy and Lemeiux! Igor The Professor! Stevie Y talking to the refs! I think I may love you now sythe ;)

I have big pictures of two of those fights in my room. DMac throwing that first punch, and then Shanny jumping on Roy. I used to have one of the Statue of Liberty goal, but I think it got misplaced in the move.
Hockeytown=love.

juju said @ 6:04am GMT on 20th May
I'm a tremendous fan of skilled play, pretty goals and technique... but come on, a good hockey fight is a sight to see. Especially goalie fights. Though it only ever feels like it has "meaning" in the playoffs.

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:52am GMT on 20th May
I know plenty about hockey. It's just that I don't give a fuck until the San Jose motherfuking sharks take home the cup.

lilmookieesquire said @ 3:13am GMT on 20th May
JewyPEZ>that is the dumbest thing I have seen in my life. I love it. I say vote for -_-. Let's face it, he might need some time off the net, and given all his "I eat your muffin, I eat it up" I think he'd be a great candidate.

-_- said @ 1:47pm GMT on 20th May
Given your track record thus far I embrace this endorsement of my innocence.

redemption said @ 3:33am GMT on 20th May
As promised, and ripped shamelessly from the site I get a lot of my recipes from (bbc.co.uk/food) ... a crumble:

Ingredients
For the pastry
250g/9oz plain flour
100g/3½oz unsalted butter
100g/3½oz icing sugar
2 medium eggs
1 vanilla pod - cut and split
For the crumble
35g/1oz plain flour
35g/1oz caster sugar
pinch of cinnamon
For the filling
5 bananas
180g/6oz butter
180g/6oz sugar
6 tbsp cream
For the chocolate sauce
100ml/3½fl oz cream
50g/1¾oz chocolate

Method
1. Rub flour and butter together, add icing sugar.
2. Beat the eggs and vanilla seeds and add to mix. Bring mix together and wrap in cling film. Leave to rest in the fridge for one hour.
3. After resting, roll out the pastry, line 20cm/8in tart ring and blind bake at 180C/360F/Gas 4 for 15-20 minutes.
4. Slice bananas lengthways and, in a hot non-stick pan, add the sugar and butter and take to a caramel stage.
5. Add sliced bananas, add cream and coat bananas all over. Put mix in tart case.
6. Rub flour, castor sugar and cinnamon together and sprinkle on top.
7. Bake for ten minutes until golden.
8. Heat cream, take off heat and add chocolate.
9. Mix until chocolate is melted.
10. Slice tart and drizzle the chocolate sauce around it.

I would go and change all the names to SÉ it, but I figure it's easier to follow without.

Todomanna said @ 3:40am GMT on 20th May
There is a disappointing lack of thumble in your crumble.

sythe said @ 9:49am GMT on 20th May [Score:5 Informative]
End of Day 3

It felt as though the sun didn’t so much set this evening as flee from the coming night. Once again I watched the hapless bag of flour get chased around the countertop. Entertaining, no doubt, but also inevitably unproductive. His screams for the head of JewyPEZ were eventually picked up by the rest of the ingredients. “Everyone knows bread molds!” cried the hysterical crowd, gathering together en masse.

The throng advanced across the kitchen towards the vaguely protesting baked good. “Fellas, look at me, I’m just like all of you. Look! I’m not even past my ‘Sell by’ date!” He said, pointing at stamp on his bag. The mob ignored him, pressing inward till he vanished from my sight. I had no desire to see him torn limb from limb so it was through the closed refrigerator door that I heard the mob confirm what my nose had already told me: JewyPEZ was just a Simple Ingredient. I would not get much sleep this coming night.

Night actions please.

JewyPEZ said @ 10:00am GMT on 20th May
Har.

theolypse said @ 11:20am GMT on 20th May
I tried. Sorry.

Jewbacchus said @ 12:18pm GMT on 20th May
Fellow Townies: I recommend we spend the night looking over these last few days, and trying to make use of the immaculate records kept by our town stenographer. Perhaps we can glean some insight into the souls of those around us while we sleeplessly guard our lives.